© 2024 WOSU Public Media
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
WOSB 91.1 FM in Marion is off the air. In the meantime, listen online or with the WOSU mobile app.

2015 In Review: Big Ohio Supreme Court Decisions

Ohio Supreme Court Gavel statue
Creative Commons

Over the next few days, we’ll bring you a series of stories looking back at the biggest moments in state government in 2015. Statehouse correspondent Karen Kasler begins our series with a look at the year’s biggest cases decided by the Ohio Supreme Court.

The court sided with journalists on police records at private colleges and on the key card data Democratic former Cuyahoga County executive Ed FitzGerald withheld during the 2014 campaign for governor. And they ruled for the Cincinnati Enquirer, saying Butler County shouldn’t have withheld a recording of a call a 911 dispatcher made to a woman who’d called after her husband was stabbed by her son, and then hung up.

Justice Paul Pfeifer quizzed the Enquirer’s John Greiner in arguments in 2014.

O’Donnell: “We’re to trust to your editors rather than to the judge to make the decision as to what might or might not be prejudicial to the defendant?”

Greiner: “I always liked Thomas Jefferson’s quote that if he had to choose between a government with no newspapers or newspapers with no government, he would take the latter rather than the former.”

One of the biggest decisions of the year came down in September in favor of Akron-based White Hat Management, the for-profit manager of 10 Cleveland-area charter schools, seven of which had serious academic problems.

Five justices agreed that when the contracts ended, the charters had to buy from White Hat school equipment that was purchased with state money, siding with White Hat’s lawyer David Paragus.

“This case is simply a straightforward contract interpretation case,” Paragus argued.

But Justice Paul Pfeifer called the White Hat contracts “unconscionable”, and Justice Bill O’Neill wrote that the judgment “rewards failure and encourages its repetition in the future in the name of profit”.

The resulting outrage led lawmakers to put language into a charter school reform law signed in November that would require limits on contracts charters can sign with management companies.

There were also rulings related to local governments’ home rule powers. In February, the justices delivered a blow to cities with local laws banning the drilling technique known as fracking, saying the bans couldn’t be enforced if a company had permission of the owner and a state permit.

And in April, the court rejected the so-called “jock tax” that Cleveland levied against visiting professional athletes.

Ryan McManus, who represented retired Chicago Bears linebacker Hunter Hillenmeyer, told the court in January that there’s a problem with basing income taxes on the number of games visiting players play instead of the number of days they work.

“The problem is that one of these methods results in unfair apportionment under the constitution, and results in the city of Cleveland reaching beyond its borders and taxing income earned elsewhere. That’s impermissible, not only under Ohio law, but that’s unconstitutional,” said Hillenmeyer.

Cleveland says the decision may mean it will have to pay as much as $2.4 million in tax refunds to out-of-town National Football League players.

In November, the court upheld the requirement that convicted sex offenders register and check in periodically with authorities, saying it’s not cruel and unusual punishment, in a case involving a 21-year-old man who had sex with a 15-year-old.

Clark County Assistant Prosecutor Ryan Saunders argued the case against Travis Blankenship’s claim in March.

“Mr. Blankenship committed a crime. He was 21. He had sex with a 15-year-old. And as part of that, he’s a sex offender.”

The court also ruled against some of the language the state ballot board had written on the marijuana legalization effort that eventually failed.

And after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld same-sex marriage, the court’s professional conduct board said judges couldn’t refuse to marry same-sex couples or completely stop performing marriages to avoid the issue.